Subscribe via email

Enter your email address:

Sunday 26 May 2013

God’s Mercy in Messed Up Families


Original

I love this post from Jon Bloom.  It's so encouraging to be reminded of the reality of family life portrayed in the Bible and the insight that this is the workshop within which God changes us for our joy and His eternal glory. 

Have you ever noticed how hard it is to find an example of what we would call a “healthy family” in the Bible? It’s a lot easier to find families with a lot of sin and a lot of pain than to find families with a lot of harmony. For example, here’s just a sampling from Genesis:
  • ·         The first recorded husband and wife calamitously disobey God (Genesis 3).
  • ·         Their firstborn commits fratricide (Genesis 4:8).
  • ·         Sarah’s grief over infertility moves her to give her servant, Hagar, to Abraham as a concubine to bear a surrogate child (Genesis 16). When it happens, Sarah abuses Hagar in jealous anger. Abraham is passive in the whole affair.
  • ·         Lot, reluctant to leave sexually perverse Sodom, his home, has to be dragged out by angels and then weeks later his daughters seduce him into drunken incest (Genesis 19).
  • ·         Isaac and Rebecca play favorites with their twin boys, whose sibling rivalry becomes one of the worst in history (Genesis 25).
  • ·         Esau has no discernment. He sells his birthright for soup (Genesis 25), grieves his parents by marrying Canaanite women (Genesis 26), and nurses a 20-year murderous grudge against his conniving younger brother.
  • ·         Jacob (said conniver) manipulates and deceives his brother out of his birthright (Genesis 25) and blessing (Genesis 27).
  • ·         Uncle Laban deceives nephew Jacob by somehow smuggling Leah in as Jacob’s bride instead of Rachel (Genesis 29). This results in Jacob marrying sisters — a horrible situation (see Leviticus 18:18). This births another nasty sibling rivalry where the sisters’ competition for children (including giving their servants to Jacob as concubines) produce the twelve patriarchs of Israel (Genesis 30).
  • ·         Jacob’s daughter, Dinah, is raped by the pagan, Shechem, who then wants to marry her. Simeon and Levi respond by massacring all the men of Shechem’s town (Genesis 34).
  • ·         Jacob’s oldest son, Reuben, can’t resist his incestuous desires and sleeps with one of his father’s concubines, the mother of some of his brothers (Genesis 35).
  • ·         Ten of Jacob’s sons contemplate fratricide, but sell brother Joseph into slavery instead. Then they lie about it to their father for 22 years until Joseph exposes them (Genesis 37, 45).
  • ·         Judah, as a widower, frequented prostitutes. This occurred frequently enough that his daughter-in-law, Tamar, whom he had dishonored, knew that if she disguised herself as one, he’d sleep with her. He did and got her pregnant (Genesis 38).

That’s just the beginning. Time would fail me to talk of:
  • ·         Aaron’s sons, Nadab and Abihu (Leviticus 10),
  • ·         Gideon’s murderous son, Abimelech (Judges 9),
  • ·         Samson’s un-Nazirite immorality (Judges 14–16),
  • ·         Eli’s worthless sons (1 Samuel –2-4),
  • ·         Samuel’s worthless sons (1 Samuel 8),
  • ·         David’s sordid family (2 Samuel 11–18),
  • ·         Wise Solomon who unwisely married 1,000 women, turned from God, and whose proverbial instruction went essentially unheeded by most of his heirs (1 Kings 11–12),
  • ·         Etc., etc.

Why is the Bible loud on sinfully dysfunctional families and quiet on harmonious families?
Well, for one thing, most families aren’t harmonious. Humanity is not harmonious. We are alienated — alienated from God and each other. So put alienated, selfish sinners together in a home, sharing possessions and the most intimate aspects of life, having different personalities and interests, and a disparate distribution of power, abilities, and opportunities, and you have a recipe for a sin-mess.
But there’s a deeper purpose at work in this mess. 
The Bible’s main theme is God’s gracious plan to redeem needy sinners. It teaches us that what God wants most for us is that we 
1) become aware of our sinfulness and 
2) our powerlessness to save ourselves, as we 
3) believe and love his Son and the gospel he preached, and 
4) graciously love one another. 
And it turns out that the family is an ideal place for all of these to occur.
But what we often fail to remember is that the mess is usually required for these things to occur. Sin must be seen and powerlessness must be experienced before we really turn to Jesus and embrace his gospel. And offenses must be committed if gracious love is to be demonstrated. So if we’re praying for our family members to experience these things, we should expect trouble.
Family harmony is a good desire and something to work toward. But in God’s plan, it may not be what is most needed. What may be most needed is for our family to be a crucible of grace, a place where the heat of pressure forces sin to surface providing opportunities for the gospel to be understood and applied. And when this happens the messes become mercies.
My point is this:
If your family is not the epitome of harmony, take heart. 
God specializes in redeeming messes. 
See yours as an opportunity for God’s grace to become visible to your loved ones 
and pray hard that God will make it happen.

Saturday 18 May 2013

Is "Radical Christianity" the New Legalism?

I thought this article by Ed Stetzer was really interesting.

I hadn't thought through the issue of “radical Christianity” and the danger of legalism before so it was good food for thought. 

The  idea that the desire to “be radical” / change the world /make a difference can be idolatrous came up for me just last week through reading Keller’s “Every Good Endeavour” but nonetheless it's a new thought.   (Is it the product of an affluent 21st century, narcissistic consumerism…..  100 years ago you just did what your dad did and got on with it – now if you're not “changing the world”, well, it's not worthwhile…..)


Anyway – thought you'd be interested.

Wednesday 8 May 2013

CrossTalk

Your friend just left his wife. Someone in your Life Group is depressed.  A relative has been diagnosed with an incurable disease.  How on earth can you offer real hope and help from God's Word?  How can you offer real, life giving water and not simply platitudes? 

I've just finished reading CrossTalk by Michael Emlet and I would highly recommend it.  The subtitle of the book is "Where Life and Scripture Meet" and it's all about how we can faithfully apply the bible to the lives of those people we're sometimes called to minister to.

You might meet a friend for coffee and they share stuff with you - a loss, anxiety, hurt, fear, grievance, sin..... What do you say?   How can you bring something from God's Word to bear with next to no time to look passages up?   Perhaps someone wants to meet with you and you've got advanced warning of the fact that they are going to ask for help with a problem but, again, how do you prepare for that in the scarce time you have?  And how do you avoid just resorting to only ever using a dozen "proof texts" whilst ignoring 98% of the rest of the bible?

CrossTalk shows in a practical and relevant way how you can use any passage, perhaps from your reading that morning or the message you heard in a sermon, to help bring gospel-oriented counsel to another person.  Emlet explains how to first "read the bible", looking for the original context and then the expanded context and then how to "read the person" as saint, sufferer and sinner.  He then shows, in carefully worked examples, how to apply the scripture legitimately to an individual whether you have a few minutes to prepare or longer.

Highly recommended for all those who want to speak God's Word in the power of the Spirit to others.

Wednesday 1 May 2013

Duke and Duchess of Cambridge have made a foetus


The satirical Anglican blogger Archbishop Cranmer has made a point that about the royal baby that was nagging away at me like a splinter in my mind.....something just wasn't quite right about the whole thing but I couldn't put my finger on it....until I read his Grace's excellent post.   Yes, that's it - that's why all the hype is somewhat lodged in the throat.....



His Grace would like to congratulate the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge on the announcement that they are expecting their first baby. Girl or boy, he or she is destined to ascend the Throne and reign over the United Kingdom (should it remain united) and the Dominions overseas.


But His Grace is puzzled.

Everywhere he turns he reads about a Royal baby. Even The Guardian talks of the couple 'expecting their first child', despite the Duchess being in the 'very early stages' of pregnancy. We are told that the couple 'are to be parents', and that this 'will be the Queen's third great-grandchild', and 'a first grandchild for Prince Charles'.

And the child's birthright is acknowledged: yes, he or she is 'destined to wear the crown one day'; he or she 'will become third in line to the throne', which the Prime Minister described it as 'absolutely wonderful news'. Even Ed Miliband tweeted: 'Fantastic news for Kate, William and the country. A royal baby is something the whole nation will celebrate.'

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, said: "The whole nation will want to join in celebrating this wonderful news. We wish the Duchess the best of health and happiness in the months ahead."

And speculation abounds about the name: Charles? Diana? With The Guardian freely referring to 'their baby' and already anticipating his or her 'first day at school'.


Baby? Destiny? Parents? Great-grandchild? School? Even the Twitter hashtag is #RoyalBaby.

Surely such 'pro-choice' newspapers and journals (and people) should be talking about a bunch of pluripotent stem cells, an embryo or a foetus? For reports suggest that the Duchess is still in her first trimester, so this is not yet a baby; and certainly nothing with any kind of destiny. At this stage, surely, it is a non-person, just like the other 201,931 non-persons who last year were evacuated from wombs in England, Scotland and Wales.


Or are royal foetuses endowed with full humanity from the point of conception?